新版gre寫作新題庫：argument27

The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper.
Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists lobby is to widen the highway, adding an additional lane of traffic. But last years addition of a lane to the nearby Green Highway was followed by a worsening of traffic jams on it. A better alternative is to add a bicycle lane to Blue Highway. Many area residents are keen bicyclists. A bicycle lane would encourage them to use bicycles to commute, and so would reduce rush-hour traffic rather than fostering an increase.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
中文翻譯：
乘客抱怨在郊區與市中心的B高速公路的更長交通高峰期使他們在路上的時間多花了一倍。 一個駕駛協會的不錯建議是拓寬高速公路，修建一條附加機動車道。但去年但臨近的G高速採用了相同的方法後交通狀況更加惡化。一種更好的建議是在B高速上修一條自行車道。很多的當地人都是自行車愛好者。一條新的自行車道將會激勵他們騎自行車外出，這樣的方式照比駕駛協會的建議會減少尖峰時間而不是延長。
寫一篇回應，討論還需要何種具體的證據才能更好的評估上面的論證，並解釋這個證據是如何強化/削弱這篇文章的論證的。
此上就是新版gre寫作新題庫 argument27的內容從今天起小編就給大家連續提供新版gre寫作新題庫argument部分的內容。希望大家能夠在練習中提高自己的寫作水平。